Winner probability ≠ win by this method.
The percentages describe the winner only; they do not estimate a win by that method. Methods have not been tested by the model. Decision means a judges’ decision; KO/TKO includes stoppages from strikes.
FINAL ROUNDFIGHT INTELLIGENCEENGINE 3 / FORECAST ISSUE 001
Thirteen matchups. Every pick has a case.
Colour = our pick. Grey = the opponent.
These are forecasts; results are not yet known.
Raw probability of the picked fighter winning.
Experimental estimates, with uneven evidence.
A separate judgement if the pick wins.
It is not a model-tested method prediction.
THE COMPLETE CARD
Showing 13 matchups


Silva has the stronger opponent history, including his win over Arnold Allen. Delgado has the better recorded striking margin and longer reach. This is effectively even.
Four of Silva's six captured UFC wins were stoppages by strikes, including one doctor stoppage; five were finishes overall. That makes a striking stoppage the method lean if he wins.
Delgado has never been stopped in his five captured UFC bouts; his only defeat and his last three fights went to decisions. Silva also won his latest bout by decision, and the winner forecast itself is close.


Moreno has stronger opposition experience, higher striking output and better recorded takedown defence. His two consecutive losses and Morales's two submission wins temper the pick.
Five of Moreno's eleven captured UFC wins were decisions, including his two latest wins over Albazi and Erceg. A points win is the cautious lean.
Moreno has six UFC finish wins too, so decision is only the largest single category. Morales has a prior KO loss and won all three of his captured UFC victories by submission.


McMillen's two UFC wins show an exceptional striking-volume advantage; he landed 252 significant strikes against Montes. Both fighters have only two UFC bouts, so this estimate is fragile.
Both of McMillen's UFC wins ended by strikes, against Zecchini and Montes. His observed UFC winning methods support a TKO lean.
This is only two UFC bouts. Rahiki is also 2–0 with two stoppages and no captured UFC loss, so there is no demonstrated UFC stoppage vulnerability to rely on.


Fiorot has the stronger recorded striking differential and takedown defence, with an 8–1 UFC record. Grasso's recent stoppage of Maycee Barber is clear counterevidence.
Five of Fiorot's eight UFC wins were decisions. Four of Grasso's five UFC defeats also went to the judges.
Fiorot stopped Jasudavicius in her latest bout, and Grasso returned with a knockout of Barber. Their recent finishes keep a striking finish possible.


Cortes-Acosta has three stoppage wins in his last five and the better recent knockdown rate. Blaydes's wrestling and control history give him a clear route to overturn the pick.
Cortes Acosta has five KO/TKO wins in ten UFC victories. Five of Blaydes' six UFC defeats were striking stoppages, including a doctor stoppage; Waldo's latest three wins were knockouts.
Half of Waldo's UFC wins were decisions, and Blaydes' latest defeat went the distance. Blaydes also offers a wrestling route that makes the winner call uncertain.


Martinez is 3–0 in the UFC, including wins over Font and Vera; Ige is 1–4 in his last five. Ige's first bantamweight appearance makes the division change an additional uncertainty.
Martinez won his last two UFC bouts by decision; nine of Ige's ten UFC defeats went to the judges.
Ige was knocked out in his latest bout, and Martinez has a UFC knockout win. This is Ige's first announced bantamweight bout, so prior featherweight durability may not transfer directly.


Chairez has three straight wins and a substantial age advantage. Elliott's takedowns and control remain a serious counter: the model's lean does not establish that Chairez can stop his wrestling.
Three of Chairez' four UFC wins came by submission, while Elliott has five submission losses in twelve UFC defeats.
Elliott's other seven defeats went to decisions, and he has three UFC submission wins himself. Chairez also needed a split decision against Bunes.


Bahamondes has the youth, reach and historical striking-output advantages. He has lost his last two, and his move from lightweight to welterweight makes past rates imperfect comparisons.
Three of Bahamondes' six UFC wins were KO/TKOs; Salikhov has three KO/TKO losses among five UFC defeats, including his latest bout.
Bahamondes also has two submission wins, and his last two bouts were decision losses. Moving from lightweight to welterweight changes the matchup context; prior finishing power is not proven at this new weight.


Belgaroui outlanded his first two UFC opponents 196–40 in significant strikes, winning both by stoppage. That supports the direction; two bouts and his conceded takedowns do not justify treating 82% as dependable.
Both Belgaroui UFC wins ended by strikes, against Bekoev and Abdul-Malik.
Only two UFC bouts are available. Santos has not been knocked out in his three captured UFC bouts; his defeats were a decision and a submission.


Gantt's debut showed six takedowns, substantial control and a TKO. However, it was his only UFC bout. Klose is 10–3 in the archive, and Elo favours Klose: this is a particularly questionable confidence estimate.
Gantt's only UFC win was a TKO, and two of Klose's three UFC defeats were KO/TKOs. Gantt's current official biography also reports six consecutive finishes, comprising four TKOs and two guillotines.
One UFC appearance is a very small sample. Klose has gone to decisions in nine of thirteen UFC bouts, and Gantt's official biography lists five professional submission wins, so submission or decision remain credible alternatives.


Garcia's recent wins and opponent-adjusted record support a modest lean. Rongzhu also has three straight wins. Adding his omitted May Road result reduces Garcia's estimate from 64.0% to 60.5%; full statistics were not added.
Five of Garcia's seven UFC wins were decisions, including two of his latest three wins. His captured UFC history supports a points win.
Garcia also stopped Gordon recently. Rongzhu's additional May 2026 TKO win and three older Road wins sit outside the frozen six-bout history; the disclosed one-result update remains incomplete.


Neither fighter has a recorded UFC bout in the model. There is no demonstrated performance advantage behind this small lean; treat the fight as a toss-up.
There is not enough reliable matchup evidence to choose a method. Both fighters are making their UFC debuts.
Regional sources suggest a possible striking-finish route for King but disagree on his complete professional record. Rosas' official profile lists two KO wins and four submission wins, so the absence of UFC history does not imply a lack of finishing ability.


Tarin showed high output in her debut win, but it is one fifteen-minute sample. Aldrich has won four of her last five; both Elo and the older model favour Aldrich. This is a disputed, low-evidence pick.
Tarin won her only UFC bout by decision. Aldrich has gone to decisions in fourteen of seventeen UFC bouts, including four of her six losses.
Tarin has only one UFC appearance. Her current official biography lists four professional KO wins and two submission wins, so her wider record contains substantial finishing threat.
No matchups found. Try another name or method.
READ THE ESTIMATES IN CONTEXT
These are raw research probabilities. Supporting histories are not feature attributions or causal explanations. Small samples and incomplete historical coverage weaken several estimates.
The percentages describe the winner only; they do not estimate a win by that method. Methods have not been tested by the model. Decision means a judges’ decision; KO/TKO includes stoppages from strikes.
One newly verified Road result reduces Garcia from 64.0% in the original sealed issue to 60.5% in a separate result-only calculation. Full paired statistics were not added. Three older Road wins also remain outside this limited calculation. The original forecasts, models and data remain preserved. A missing-stat bout also advances the existing recency weights; no new strike or control counts were invented.
These V3 forecasts were recorded before the event alongside V2 and Elo comparisons. One card is a pilot; it cannot establish a stable success rate. Probabilities remain experimental.
| Announced matchup | V3 pick | Raw chance | Prior UFC bouts first / second |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jean Silvavs Jose Miguel Delgado | Jean Silva | 51.2% | 7 / 5 |
| Brandon Morenovs Joseph Morales | Brandon Moreno | 63.1% | 20 / 5 |
| Tommy McMillenvs Marwan Rahiki | Tommy McMillen | 68.6% | 2 / 2 |
| Manon Fiorotvs Alexa Grasso | Manon Fiorot | 61.2% | 9 / 15 |
| Waldo Cortes Acostavs Curtis Blaydes | Waldo Cortes Acosta | 57.8% | 13 / 21 |
| David Martinezvs Dan Ige | David Martinez | 72.1% | 3 / 21 |
| Tim Elliottvs Edgar Chairez | Edgar Chairez | 62.5% | 22 / 7 |
| Ignacio Bahamondesvs Muslim Salikhov | Ignacio Bahamondes | 68.4% | 10 / 14 |
| Yousri Belgarouivs Djorden Santos | Yousri Belgaroui | 82.3% | 2 / 3 |
| Drakkar Klosevs Tommy Gantt | Tommy Gantt | 73.4% | 13 / 1 |
| Rafa Garciavs Rongzhu | Rafa Garcia | 64.0% | 11 / 6 |
| Sean Kingvs Jessie Rosas | Sean King | 51.3% | 0 / 0 |
| JJ Aldrichvs Regina Tarin | Regina Tarin | 57.1% | 17 / 1 |
One older-source pairing is retained for reconciliation in the complete forecast file.
The general matchup workbench uses the original acquired archive: 2,770 historical fighters, data through 5 September 2026. A known history gap affects Rongzhu. The briefing above adds one verified Road result; full statistics remain unavailable.